Keywords
MERCOSUR
European Union
Freedom of movement
Family status
How to Cite
Abstract
This work talks about divorce, as an institution that organizes the family status arising from the dissolution of marriage, with a focus on transnational effects in regional integration blocks, where freedom of movement is guaranteed. The article analyses the ruling of divorce, through typical rules of private international law and international legal cooperation means, in the two major blocks that currently exist: MERCOSUR and the European Union. This study is divided according to three main aspects of divorce at a transnational level: jurisdiction, applicable law and recognition and enforcement of foreign decisions. A comparative analysis between the legal regime of divorce in the rules of both blocks is done, with the aim to indicate how MERCOSUR’s rules may benefit from the European experience.
References
ARAÚJO, Nádia de. Direito internacional privado: teoria e prática brasileira. 6a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Simplíssimo, 2016.
ARROYO, Diego P. Fernandez (Ed.). Derecho internacional privado de los Estados del Mercosur. Buenos Aires: Zavalia, 2003.
AUDIT, Bernard. D’AVOUT. Louis. Droit International privé. 6a ed. Paris: Economica, 2010.
BAARSMA, Nymke Anna. The Europeanisation of international family law. La Haye/Berlin, T M C Asser Springer distr., 2011.
BIDAUD-GARON. Christine. FULCHIRON, Hugues. Vers un statut européen de la famille. Paris: Dalloz, 2014.
BLAIR, Marianne et alii. Family law in the world community: cases, materials, and problems in comparative and international family law. 2a ed. Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2009.
BUCHER, Andreas. Le couple en droit international privé. Paris, LGDJ, 2004.
BUREAU, Dominique. WATT, Horatia Muir. Droit international privé. t. II. 2 ed. Paris: PUF, 2010.
COULANGES, Fustel de. La cité antique: étude sur le culte, le droit, les institutions de la Grèce et de Rome. 12a ed. Paris: Hachette, 1888.
DE SMET, Crina Alina Tagarta. “The European Divorce (Applicable Law) Council Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 of 20 December 2010 Implementing Enhanced Cooperation in the Area of the Law Applicable to Divorce and Legal Separation”. Proceedings of Joint International Conference 10th Edition European Integration Realities and Perspectives; 5th Edition The Global Advancement of Universities and Colleges. 2015, p. 116-127.
DOLINGER, Jacob. Direito civil internacional. vol. 1: A família no direito internacional privado. tomo primeiro: Casamento e divórcio no direito internacional privado. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 1997.
DOLINGER, Jacob. TIBURCIO, Carmen. Direito internacional privado. 13a ed. Rio de Janeiro: GEN/Forense, 2017.
FERRAND, Frédérique. FULCHIRON, Hugues (dir.). La rupture do mariage en droit comparé. Coll. Droit Comparé et Européen. vol. 19. Paris: Société de Législation Comparée, 2015.
FULCHIRON, Hugues. PANET, Amélie. WAUTELET, Patrick (Ed.). L’autonomie de la volonté dans les relations familiales internationales. Bruxelas: Bruylant, 2017.
GONZÁLEZ, Javier Carrascosa. “La ley aplicable a la separación judicial y al divórcio en defecto de elección de ley por los cónyuges. análisis del artículo 8 del reglamento 1259/2010 de 20 diciembre 2010”. Cuadernos derecho transnacional, 2012, n° 52, p. 52-85.
NÍ SHÚILLEABHÁIN, Máire. Cross-border divroce law: Brussels II bis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
PHILIPS, Roderick. A short story of divorce. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
RALSER, Élise. La célébration du mariage en Droit International privé. [Tese de doutorado]. Orientador: Jacques FOYER.Université Panthéon-Assas. Paris. vol. 2, 1998, 433p.
RAMOS, André Carvalho. GRAMSTRUP, Erik Frederico. Comentários à lei de introdoção às normas do direito brasileiro. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2016.
WELLER, Marc-Philippe. “Die neue Mobilitätsanknüpfung im Internationalen Familienrecht – Abfederung des Personalstatutenwechsels über die Datumtheorie”. Praxis des Internationalen Privat- un Verfahrenrechts (IPrax), 2014, vol 3, n° 34.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de la Secretaría del Tribunal Permanente de Revisión