Financiamiento de terceros y conflictos de intereses: ¿hay alguna forma de domar a la bestia?
PDF (English)

Palabras clave

Arbitraje Internacional
Financiamiento de Terceros
MERCOSUR

Cómo citar

Marengo Irala, M. (2022). Financiamiento de terceros y conflictos de intereses: ¿hay alguna forma de domar a la bestia? : Una visión sobre el MERCOSUR. Revista De La Secretaría Del Tribunal Permanente De Revisión, 10(19), p. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.16890/rstpr.a10.n19.e463

Resumen

El mercado de financiación de terceros (TPF) ha crecido rápidamente en los últimos años, especialmente en el campo del arbitraje internacional.
Sus beneficios junto con los riesgos que podría soportar han recibido mucha atención. En consecuencia, el apetito de la industria por TPF ha crecido exponencialmente en un corto período de tiempo. Desde 2012, esta industria aumentó en más del 500%, en cuanto a la cantidad de acuerdos de financiamiento celebrados y el volumen de financiadores activos en buscade oportunidades viables.
En este sentido, considerando que “se dice muy poco en cuanto a la divulgación”, se analiza si la divulgación debe ser obligatoria para evitar la posible existencia de conflictos de interés entre un árbitro y el financiador. Esto cobra relevancia si se tiene en cuenta que las instituciones arbitrales establecen que la independencia e imparcialidad del árbitro son indispensables,
pero poco dicen respecto a los acuerdos TPF y su impacto en la imparcialidad o independencia del árbitro en caso de conflicto.

https://doi.org/10.16890/rstpr.a10.n19.e463
PDF (English)

Citas

ACERIS LAW LLC. Disclosure of Third Party Funding in International Arbitration.

December 29, 2017. Available at :< https://www.acerislaw.com/disclosurethird-

party-funding-international-arbitration/>

ALLEN, Nathalie; MALLET, Daisy “Arbitrator Disclosure - No Room for the Color Blind”. Asian International Arbitration Journal. Singapore International Arbitration Centre (in cooperation with Kluwer Law International). Kluwer. Law International, vol. 7, n°2, p. 118 – 147, 2011.

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION (ICDR). ICDR International Arbitration Rules. Available at: <https://www.icdr.org/rules_forms_fees>

AMERICAN LEGAL FINANCE ASSOCIATION (ALFA). Code of Conduct. Available at: <https://americanlegalfin.com/alfa-code-of-conduct/>

ARBITRATION AND ADR WORLDWIDE (LCIA). Arbitration Rules. Available at:<https://www.lcia.org/Dispute_Resolution_Services/lcia-arbitrationrules-2020.aspx>

ASSOCIATION OF LITIGATION FUNDERS. Code of conduct. Available at:

<https://associationoflitigationfunders.com/code-of-conduct/>

BEISNER, John; MILLER Jessica; RUBIN. “Selling Lawsuits, Buying Trouble. Third-Party Litigation in the United States”. U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform, 2009. Available at: <https://instituteforlegalreform.com/wpcontent/uploads/2020/10/Still_Selling_Lawsuits_-_Third_Party_Litigation_Funding_A_Decade_Later.pdf>

BENTHAM, Jeremmy. Code of Best Practices. Available at: <https://www.benthamimf.com/docs/default-source/default-document-library/code-ofbest-

practices-2018.pdf?sfvrsn=e44fd6cd_24>

BENTHAM, Jeremmy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Batoche Book. Kitchener, 2000. Available at: <https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/bentham/morals.pdf>

BLAVI, Francisco. “It’s About Time To Regulate Third Party Funding”. Kluwer Arbitration Blog, December 17, 2015. Available at: <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com.ubproxy.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/2015/12/17/its-abouttime-to-regulate-third-party-funding/>

BOGHART, Christopher. “Deeply Flawed: A Perspective on the ICCA-Queen Mary Task Force on Third-Party Funding”. Buford Capital LLC Blog. Available at: <https://www.burfordcapital.com/insights/insights-container/deeplyflawed-a-perspective-on-the-icca-queen-mary-task-force-on-third-partyfunding/>

CÁMARA ARGENTINA DE COMERCIO Y SERVICIOS. Available at: <https://www.cac.com.ar/>

CÂMARA DE CONCILIAÇÃO, MEDIAÇÃO E ARBITRAGEM DE SÃO PAULO. Resolução n°6/2019. Available at: < http://www.camaradearbitragemsp.com.br/pt/res/docs/Resolucao_n_6.2019.pdf>

CENTRO DE ARBITRAJE Y MEDIACIÓN DE LA CÁMARA DE COMERCIO BRASILCANADÁ

(CAM-CCBC). Available at: https://ccbc.org.br/cam-ccbc-centroarbitragem-

mediacao/en/

CENTRO DE ARBITRAJE Y MEDIACIÓN DE LA CÁMARA DE COMERCIO BRASILCANADÁ

(CAM-CCBC). AR 18/2016 – Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada, Recomendaciones sobre la existencia de financiamiento de terceros en arbitrajes” administrados por CAM-CCBC”. Available at: <https://ccbc.org.br/cam-ccbc-centro-arbitragemmediacao/en/administrative-resolutions/ar-18-2016-recommendationsregarding-

the-existence-of-third-party-funding-in-arbitrations-administeredby-cam-ccbc/>

CENTRO DE MEDIACIÓN Y ARBITRAJE COMERCIAL DE LA CÁMARA ARGENTINA

DE COMERCIO Y SERVICIOS. Reglamento de arbitraje. Available at: <https://www.cac.com.ar/data/documentos/20_Reglamento%20de%20Arbitraje%20

CEMARC%20v.17.05.2017.pdf>

COMMISSION, Jeffrey P. “Precedent in Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Citation Analysis of a Developing Jurisprudence”. Journal of International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International 2007, vol. 24, n° 2, p. 129–158. Available at: <https://www.linklaters.com/pdfs/Insights/us/JOIA_Article.pdf>

DE BRABANDERE, Eric; LEPELTAK, Julia. “Third Party Funding in International

Investment Arbitration”. Grotius Centre Working Paper, n° 2012/1. Available

at: <https://ssrn.com/abstract=2078358>

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. “EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade

Agreement” (CETA). Available at: <https://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/infocus/

ceta/ceta-chapter-by-chapter/>

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Available at: < http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1437>

EU-VIETNAM. Investment Protection Agreement. September, 2018. Available at: <https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2018/september/tradoc_157394.pdf>

FRANCE. CONSEIL NATIONAL DES BARREAUX. Resolution. February 21, 2017. Available at: <http://www.avocatparis.org/system/files/publications/resolution_financement_de_larbitrage_par_les_tiers.pdf>

FRIGNATi, Valentina.“Ethical Implications of Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration”. Arbitration International, vol. 32, n°3, September 2016, p. 505–522. Available at<: https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiw011>

GARIMELLA, Sai Ramani. “Third Party Funding in International Arbitration – Issues and Challenges in Asian Jurisdictions”. AALCO Journal of International Law, vol. 3, n° 1, p. 45-60, 2014. At 47. Available at: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=2520393>

GILCREST, Sarah. “When Peer Pressure Is Not Enough: Mandatory Disclosure

and Third-Party Funding”. Arbitration Brief, 2019, vol. 6, n°1, p. 60-81. HeinOnline.

GOLDSMITH, Arer; SCHERER, Maxi. “Third Party Funding in International Arbitration in Europe. Part I: Funders’ Perspectives”. International Business Law Journal, Roundtable 2012, vol. 2, p. 207-219.

HASCHER, Dominique. “Independence and Impartiality of Arbitrators: 3 Issues”. American University International Law Review, 2012, vol. 27, n°4,2012, p. 789-806. HeinOnline.

HASHU SHAHDADPURI, Khushboo. “Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration: Regulating the Treacherous Trajectory”, in PRYLES, Michael; CHAN, Philip (eds). Asian International Arbitration Journal. Singapore International Arbitration Centre in co-operation with Kluwer Law International, 2016, vol.12, n°2, p. 77 – 106.

HONG KONG. Code of Practice for Third Party Funding in Arbitration. Available

at: <https://www.gld.gov.hk/egazette/pdf/20182249/egn201822499048.

pdf>

HU, Yue. “Mandatory Disclosure of Third-Party Funding in International

Arbitration”. Peiking University of Transnational Law Review Blog. Last accessed January 25, 2020. Available at: <http://stllawreview.com/

index.php/2019/04/20/mandatory-disclosure-of-third-party-funding-ininternational-

arbitration/>

ILIESCU, Marius Nicolae. “A Trend Towards Mandatory Disclosure of Third Party Funding? Recent Developments and Positive Impact”. Kluwer Arbitration Blog, May 2, 2016. Available at: <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2016/05/02/a-trend-towards-mandatory-disclosure-of-third-partyfunding-recent-developments-and-positive-impact/#_ftn3>

INTERNATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION. (IBA). IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration, >October, 23, 2014. Available at: <https://www.ibanet.org/MediaHandler?id=e2fe5e72-eb14-4bba-b10dd33dafee8918#:~:text=Explanation%20to%20General%20Standard%203,be%20relevant%20in%20their%20view>

INTERNATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION. (IBA). <https://www.ibanet.org/clintjune-2021-arbitration-update-icdr-rules>

INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (ICC). ARBITRAJE. Available at:<https://iccwbo.org/content/uploads/sites/3/2017/03/icc-note-to-partiesand-arbitral-tribunals-on-the-conduct-of-arbitration.pdf>

INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. ICC.COMMISSION REPORT: Decision on Costs in International Arbitration. ICC Dispute Resolution Bulletin, 2015, Issue 2. Available at: <https://iccwbo.org/content/uploads/sites/3/2015/12/Decisions-on-Costs-in-International-Arbitration.pdf>

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID) Rules and Regulations. Available at: <https://icsid.worldbank.org/rules-regulations>

INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Proposal for amendment of the ICSID rules. Working Paper, August 2019,n°3, vol.1. Available at: <https://icsid.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/amendments/WP_3_VOLUME_1_ENGLISH.pdf>

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES.Eurogas Inc (United States) And Belmont Resources Inc.(Canada) Claimants–V–The Slovak Republic Respondent (ICSID Case No. Arb/14/14). September 10, 2014. Available at: <https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/casedocuments/italaw6263.pdf>

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES.“EuroGas Inc and Belmont Resources Inc v Slovak Republic, ICSID Case Nr.ARB/14/14”. Available at:<https://www.italaw.com/cases/3210>

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES.“Muhammet Cap & Sehil Infaat Endustri ve Ticaret Ltd. Sti. v. Turkmenistan. ICSID Case Nr. ARB/12/6”. Available at: <https://www.italaw.com/cases/2036>

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES.

Muhammet Çap & Sehil Inşaat Endustri ve Ticaret Ltd. Sti. v. Turkmenistan.

(ICSID Case No. ARB/12/6) . Procedural Order Nr. 3, 12 June 2015. Available at:

<https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw4350.pdf>

INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION (ICCA) . “The ICCA Reports No. 4: ICCA-Queen Mary Task Force Report on Third-Party Funding”. Available at: <https://www.arbitration-icca.org/publications/Third-Party-Funding-Report.html>

INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION. ICC Rules of Arbitration. Available at : <https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution-services/arbitration/rules-of-arbitration/>

KALICKI, Jean. “Third-Party Funding in Arbitration: Innovation and Limits in Self-Regulation (Part 1 of 2)”. Kluwer Arbitration Blog, March 13, 2012. Last accessed February 2, 2020. Available at: <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2012/03/13/third-party-funding-in-arbitrationinnovation-and-limits-in-self-regulation-part-1-of-2/>

KALICKI, Jean. “Third-Party Funding in Arbitration: Innovation and Limits in Self-Regulation (Part 2 of 2)”. Kluwer Arbitration Blog, March 14, 2012. Last accessed February 2, 2020. Available at: <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2012/03/14/third-party-funding-in-arbitration-innovations-and-limits-in-self-regulation-part-2-of-2/?print=pdf>

KNAAP, Daniel R. “Disclosure of Third-Party Funding in International Investment Arbitration: The Implications of Rule 14 as proposed in ICSID Working Paper 4”. World Arbitration and Mediation Review (WARW). Vol. 13.Nr. 2. JurisNet, LLC. 2019. Available at:

LEVY, Laurent ; BONNAN, Régis. “Third-Party Funding: Disclosure, Joinder and Impact on Arbitral Proceedings” in ICC Institute of World Business Law and others (eds), “Third-party Funding in International Arbitration”. International Chamber of Commerce, 2013.

LEW, Julian; MISTELIs, Loukas; KRÖLL, Stephan. “Comparative International Commercial Arbitration”. Kluwer Law International, 2006.

MOSELEY, Sarah. “Disclosing Third-Party Funding in International Investment Arbitration”. Texas Law Review, vol. 97, no. 6, May 2019, p. 1181-1203. HeinOnline.

NEW YORK CONVENTION. UN Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958). Available at: <http://www.newyorkconvention.org/english>

OSMANOGLU, Burcu. “Third-Party Funding in International Commercial Arbitration and Arbitrator Conflict of Interest”. Kluwer Law International.Journal of International Arbitration 32, no. 3, l 2015, p. 325–350.

PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION. PCA Case No. 2013-15, Procedural Order No. 10, January 11, 2016. “ In The Matter Of An Arbitration Under The Agreement Between The Government Of The United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland And The Government Of The Republic Of BoliviaFor The Promotion And Protection Of Investments”, May 24, 1988. Available at: < https://pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/1562>

PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION. South American Silver Ltd. (Bermuda) v. The Plurinational State of Bolivia. UNCITRAL PCA Case 2013-15. Available at: <https://pca-cpa.org/en/cases/54/>

PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION (PCA). “Chevron Corporation and Texaco Petroleum Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, UNCITRAL, PCA.Case No. 2009-23”. Available at: <https://www.italaw.com/cases/257>

QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON AND WHITE & CASE. “2015 International Arbitration Survey: Improvements and Innovations in International Arbitration”. Available at: <https://www.whitecase.com/sites/whitecase/files/files/download/publications/qmul-international-arbitrationsurvey-2015_0.pdf>

ROGERS, Catherine A. “Transparency in International Commercial Arbitration”. University of Kansas Law Review, June 2006, vol. 54, n°. 5, p. 1301-1338.HeinOnline.

SCHERER, Maxi. “Out in the Open?” Third-Party Funding in Arbitration”. Commercial Dispute Resolution Blog, 2012. Available at: <https://www.cdrnews.com/categories/expert-views/out-in-the-open-third-party-funding-inarbitration>

SHANNON, Victoria A. “Harmonizing Third-Party Litigation Funding Regulation”. Cardozo Law Review, February 2015, vol. 36, no. 3, p. 861-912.HeinOnline.

SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE. Available at: <https://www.siac.org.sg>

SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE. SIAC Investment Arbitration Rules. 2017. Available at:<https://siac.org.sg/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/SIAC-Investment-Rules-2017.pdf>

THRASHER, Rachel Denae. “The Regulation of Third Party Funding: Gathering Data for Future Analysis and Reform”. Law and Justice in the Americas Working Paper Series 9. 2018. Available at: <https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/ljawps/9>

TRUSZ, Jennifer. “Full Disclosure: Conflicts of Interest Arising from Third-Party Funding in International Commercial Arbitration”. Georgetown Law Journal, August 2013, vol. 101, No. 6, p. 1649-1682.

UK. THE SUPREME COURT. UjivraJ v. Hashwani [2010] EWCA Civ 712. Judgment Para. 23. Available at: <https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2010-0170-judgment.pdf>

UNITED NATIONS. UN Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. Done at New York, 10 june 1958. Available at:<http://www.newyorkconvention.org/english>

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Derechos de autor 2022 Revista de la Secretaría del Tribunal Permanente de Revisión

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.