Mots-clés
Fusions et acquisitions
Actes de concentration
Droit de la concurrence
Politique antitrust
Comment citer
Résumé
Cet article vise à analyser les implications du big data dans le domaine des fusions-acquisitions et du droit de la concurrence, d'un point de vue critique et comparatif. Tout d'abord, il fait une brève introduction au sujet, basée sur la consultation de textes qui parviennent à situer l'évolution du paradigme juridique actuel. Il étudie également la performance théorique de la politique antitrust au milieu de l'ère numérique. Ensuite, il procède à une analyse comparative de cas emblématiques de fusions-acquisitions du point de vue de trois autorités antitrust différentes (brésilienne, américaine et européene), essentielle pour situer le paysage juridique dans une perspective internationale. En conséquence, elle conclut que la jurisprudence s'oriente actuellement vers la mise en place d'un rôle coopératif entre les deux instituts judiciaires au sein de leurs instances respectives.
Références
BRASIL. MINISTÉRIO DA JUSTIÇA E SEGURANÇA PÚBLICA. Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica. Acordo de cooperação técnica entre o Conselho de Defesa Econômica (CADE) e a Agência Nacional de Proteção de Dados (ANPD), para o aperfeiçoamento das ações voltadas à defesa, fomento e disseminação da concorrência no âmbito dos serviços de proteção de
dados. Disponível em: <https://tinyurl.com/35e93h9c>
BRUNER, Robert F. Applied Mergers and Acquisitions. Nova Iorque: John Wiley & Sons, 1. ed., 2004.
CHEN, M., MAO, S., Zhang, Y.; LEUNG, V. C. M. Big Data: Related Technologies, Challenges; Future Prospects. London: Springer, 2014.
CLAYTON, James. UK government sets out plans to rein in Big Tech. BBC, Londres, 2022. Disponível em: < https://tinyurl.com/yckzy4ha>
COMISSÃO EUROPEIA. Case M.8124 – Microsoft/LinkedIn. Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. Merger Procedure, Bruxelas, 2016. Disponível em: <https://tinyurl.com/2p8ckxyp>
COMISSÃO EUROPEIA. Case M. 9660 – Google/Fitbit. Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. Merger Procedure, Bruxelas, 2020. Disponível em: <https://tinyurl.com/57ktp8z3>
COMISSÃO EUROPEIA. Mercado Único – novo instrumento complementar para consolidar a aplicação das regras em matéria de concorrência. Commission Press Release, Bruxelas, 2020. Disponível em: <https://tinyurl.com/4wcssauz>
COMISSÃO EUROPEIA. Mergers: Commission alleges Facebook provided misleading information about WhatsApp takeover. Commission Press Release, Bruxelas, 2016. Disponível em: <https://tinyurl.com/46yk6eh5>
COMISSÃO EUROPEIA Mergers: Commission clears proposed acquisition of DoubleClick by Google. Commission Press Release, Bruxelas, 2008. Disponível em: <https://tinyurl.com/2p8b87nx>
COMISSÃO EUROPEIA. Mergers: Commission fines Facebook €110 million for providing misleading information about WhatsApp takeover. Commission Press Release, Bruxelas, 2017. Disponível em: <https://tinyurl.com/yrexuhkr>
COMISSÃO EUROPEIA. Mergers: Commission opens in-depth investigation into the proposed acquisition of Fitbit by Google. Commission Press Release, Bruxelas, 2020. Disponível em: <https://tinyurl.com/3nw34jc2>
COMISSÃO EUROPEIA. Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — Towards a thriving data-driven economy’ (COM(2014) 442 final), July 2014. Disponível em: <https://tinyurl.com/2z2v4f8z>
CORVALÁN, Juan. Perfiles digitales humanos. Buenos Aires: La Ley, 2020.
CRÉMER, Jacques; MONTJOYE, Yves-Alexandre de; SCHWEITZER, Heike. Competition policy for the digital era: Final report. Luxemburgo: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019.
ECONOMIDES, Nicholas; LIANOS, Ioannis. “Restrictions on privacy and
exploitation in the digital economy: a market failure perspective”. Journal of
Competition Law & Economics, Oxford, 2021, vol. 17, n°4, p. 765-847.
ESTADOS UNIDOS. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Dissenting statement of commissioner Pamela Jones Harbour. File No. 071-0170. Disponível em: <https://tinyurl.com/8drnhx9d>
ESTADOS UNIDOS. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Federal Trade Commission closes Google/DoubleClick investigation: proposed acquisition unlikely to substantially lessen competition. FTC Press Release, Washington, 2007. Disponível em: <https://tinyurl.com/2p8tcmes>
EZRACHI, Ariel; STUCKE, Maurice E. «Edistortions. How data-opolies are dissipating the Internet’s potential”. In: ROLNIK, Guy (Ed.). Digital Platforms and Concentrations. 2018. Disponível em: <https://tinyurl.com/2hyazc6h>
FREUND, James C. Anatomy of a Merger: Strategies and Techniques for Negotiating Corporate Acquisitions. Nova Iorque: Law Journal Press, 1975.
GERADIN, Damien; KUSCHEWSKY, Monika. Competition law and personal data: preliminary thoughts on a complex issue. Concurrences, Nova Iorque, n. 2, p. 12, 2013.
KANG, Cecilia. “Privacy advocates decry Facebook’s purchase of WhatsApp”. The Washington Post, Washington, March 2014. Disponível em: <https://tinyurl.com/mr267ha3>
KHAN, Lina, The Separation of Platforms and Commerce. Columbia Law Review, Nova Iorque, v. 119:973, 2019.
KRAAKMAN, Reinier; ARMOUR, John; DAVIES, Paul; et al. The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
MANYIKA, James; CHUI, Michael; BROWN, Brad; et al. Big data: the next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute, 2011. Disponível em:<https://tinyurl.com/yx7zksvv>
OCDE. Supporting Investment in Knowledge Capital, Growth and Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2013.
PFEIFFER, Roberto Augusto Castellanos. Direito da concorrência, plataformas digitais e dados pessoais. 2021. [Tese, Livre-docência em direito comercial – edital FD 08/2021] – Departamento de Direito Comercial, Faculdade de Direito, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2021.
ROBERTSON, Viktoria H.S.E. “Antitrust law and digital markets: a guide to the European competition law experience in the digital economy”. In: KURZ, Heinz D.; SCHUTZ, Marlies; STROHMAIER, Rita; ZILIAN, Stella S. (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Smart Technologies: An Economic and Social Perspective. Londres: Routledge, 2022.
RUBINFELD, Daniel; GAL, Michal. RUBINFELD, Daniel; GAL, Michal. “The hidden costs of free goods: implications for antitrust enforcement”. NYU Law & Economics Research Paper Series, Nova Iorque. 2016, vol. 80, n° 401.
SCHWAB, Klaus. Shaping the future of the fourth industrial revolution: a guide to building a better world. Londres: Portfolio Penguin, 2018.
SOKOL, Daniel D.; COMERFORD, Roisin. Does antitrust have a role to play in regulating big data?. In: BLAIR, Roger D.; SOKOL, Daniel D. Antitrust, intellectual property, and high tech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
STUCKE, Maurice E. “Should we be concerned about data-opolies?”. Georgetown Law Technology Review, Washington, 2018, vol.2.2, n°275, p. 275-324.
STUCKE, Maurice E; GRUNES, Allen P. “No mistake about it: the important role of antitrust in the era of big data”.University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research, Knoxville. April 2015, n°269.
TAVARES, André Ramos. “APP’s e plataformas on-line na intermediação econômica no Brasil”. Revista de Direito Constitucional & Econômico, jan-jun, 2019, n°1, p. 13-44.
VELJANOVSKI, Cento. Algorithmic antitrust: a critical overview. In: PORTUESE, Aurelien (Ed.). Algorithmic Antitrust. Cham: Springer, 2022.
WASASTJERNA, Maria C. “The implications of big data and privacy on competition analysis in merger control and the controversial competitiondata protection interface”. European Business Law Review, Londres, 2019,vol. 30, n°3, p. 337-365.
WATERS, Richard. Microsoft-LinkedIn deal raises new competition concerns: regulators must consider whether a company can corner the market on data. Financial Times, Londres, Nov. 2016. Disponível em: <https://tinyurl.com/ryeeha4x>
WEIDNER, Justin Burton. How and why Google Glass failed. Investopedia, Nova Iorque, 2021. Disponível em: <https://tinyurl.com/mr3azd3b>
WINGFIELD, Nick; BENNER, Katie. How LinkedIn drove a wedge between Microsoft and Salesforce. The New York Times, Nova Iorque, Nov. 2016. Disponível em: <https://tinyurl.com/mpnj7efe>
Ce travail est disponible sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International .
(c) Tous droits réservés Revista da Secretaria do Tribunal Permanente de Revisão 2022