Palavras-chave
EU
inter-regionalismo
comercio
negociações
institucionalismo
Como Citar
Resumo
Esse artigo de pesquisa propõe-se a investigar a negociação no campo da política internacional e apresentar como as dinâmicas institucionais influenciam nas habilidades das instituições regionais em realizar suas próprias metas políticas. O caso escolhido, as negociações comerciais entre a União Europeia e o Mercosul, possibilita a avaliação das habilidades e dinâmicas sustentadas por ambas as instituições na interação entre elas. Com base em um desenho de pesquisa qualitativa, o artigo examina as experiências de negociadores dos dois continentes que participaram diretamente das negociações UE-Mercosul. Os resultados mostram que embora um alto grau de integração melhore os processos de aprendizado, a experiência e a legitimidade externa, apresenta também um alto risco de rigidez e, portanto, falha. Dessa maneira, esse artigo de pesquisa tira conclusões precisas sobre a maneira como estudamos as instituições regionais e como suas estruturas influenciam escolhas estratégicas.
Referências
AGENCE EUROPE PRESS. Talks for EU-Mercosur Free Trade Agreement Nearing Finishing Line, 2017.
BEACH, Derek; PEDERSEN, Rasmus. Process Tracing Methods – Foundations and Guidelines, University of Michigan Press. University of Michigan Press, 2012.
BOUZAS Roberto, DA MOTTA VEIGA, Pedro; TORRENT, Ramon. In-Depth Analysis of Mercosur Integration, Its Prospectives and the Effects Thereof on the Market Access of EU Goods, Services and Investment. 2002, 1–530. Available in: <http://www.opalc.org/images/INRE/in-depth-analysis-of-mercosur-integration.pdf>
BOUZAS, Roberto; FANELLI, José María. “Mercosur: Integración y Crecimiento”, Programa MERCOSUR, 2001.
BRADFORD, Anu. “Exporting Standards: The Externalization of the EU’s Regulatory Power via Markets”. International Review of Law and Economics. 2012, vol 42, n° 3, 158–73. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2014.09.004>
CAMROUX, David. “Interregionalism or Merely a Fourth-Level Game? An Examination of the EU-ASEAN Relationship”. East Asia 27. 2010, n° 1, 57–77. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-009-9096-x>
CONCEIÇÃO-HELDT, Eugénia. “Do Agents ‘Run Amok’? A Comparison of Agency Slack in the EU and US Trade Policy in the Doha”. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. 2013, vol 15, n° 1, 20–36. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2012.754152>
CONCEIÇÃO-HELDT, Eugenia. “Variation in EU Member States’ Preferences and the Commission’s Discretion in the Doha Round Variation in EU Member States’ Preferences and the Commission’s Discretion in the Doha Round”.
CONCEIÇÃO-HELDT, Eugénia; MEUNIER, Sophie. “Speaking with a Single Voice: Internal Cohesiveness and External Effectiveness of the EU in Global Governance”. Journal of European Public Policy. 2014, vol 1, n° 7, 961–79. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.913219>
CONCEIÇÃO-HELDT, Eugénia; MEUNIER, Sophie. “When Speaking with a Single Voice Isn’t Enough: Bargaining Power (a)Symmetry and EU External Effectiveness in Global Trade Governance”. Journal of European Public Policy. 2014, vol 21, n° 7, 980–95. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.912146>
DESIDERÁ, Neto; WALTER, Antonio. “The Evolution of Mercosur Behaving as an International Coalition, 1991-2012”. Contexto Internacional. 2016, vol 28, n° 2, 593–620. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.2016380200004>
DOCTOR, Mahruk. “Brazil’s Role in Institutions of Global Economic Governance: The WTO and G20”. Global Society. 2015, vol 29, n°, 286–300. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2015.1025041>
DÜR, Andreas; ZIMMERMANN, Hubert. “Introduction: The EU in International Trade Negotiations”. Journal of Common Market Studies. 2007, vol 45, n° 4, 771–87. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00747.x>
ELSIG, Manfred. “The EU’s Choice of Regulatory Venues for Trade Negotiations: A Tale of Agency Power?”. Journal of Common Market Studies. 2007, vol 45, n° 4, 927–48. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00754.x>
GARCÍA, María. “The European Union and Latin America: ‘Transformative Power Europe’ versus the Realities of Economic Interests”. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 2015, vol 28, n° , 621–40. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2011.647762>
GEHRING, Thomas; URBANSKI, Kevin; OBERTHÜR, Sebastian. “The European Union as an Inadvertent Great Power: EU Actorness and the Ukraine Crisis”. Journal of Common Market Studies. 2017; vol 55, n° 4, 727–43. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12530>
GOLDTHAU, Andreas and SITTER, Nick. “A Liberal Actor in a Realist World? The Commission and the External Dimension of the Single Market for Energy”. Journal of European Public Policy. 2014, vol 21, n° 10, 1452–72. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.912251>
GOMEZ ARANTZA, Arana. “European Union Policy-Making towards Mercosur”. In The European Union’s Policy towards Mercosur, 2018. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526108401.00009>
GÓMEZ-MERA, Laura. “Domestic Constraints on Regional Cooperation: Explaining Trade Conflict in MERCOSUR”. Review of International Political Economy. 2009, vol 16, n° 5, 746–77. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290802454216>
GRUGEL, Jean. “New Regionalism and Modes of Governance - Comparing US and EU Strategies in Latin America”. European Journal of International Relations. 2004, vol 10, n° 4, 603–26. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104047850>
HSIEH, Hsiu-Fang. “Three Approache to Qualitative Content Analysis”. Qualitative Health Research. 2005, vol 15, n° 9, 1277–88. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687>
KRAPOHL Sebastian. “New Institutionalism Meets International Political Economy: A New Approach to the Study of Regional Integration Dynamics In- and Outside of Europe”. Working Paper Prepared for Presentation at the GARNET Conference ‘The European Union in International Affairs’. 2008, n° 24.
LUÍZA, Patricia; KEGEL, Mohamed. “MERCOSUR and Its Current Relationship to the European Union,” Zentrum Für Europäische Integrationsforschung Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Universität Bonn, 2012.
MALAMUD, Andrés. “La Unión Europea, Del Interregionalismo Con América Latina a La Asociación Estratégica Con Brasil”. Revista CIDOB d’afers Internacionals. 2012, 219–30.
MALAMUD, Andrés. “Mercosur Turns 15: Between Rising Rhetoric and Declining Achievement”. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 2005, vol 18, n° 3, 421–36. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570500238068, p. 526>
MALAMUD, Andrés. “Presidential Diplomacy and the Institutional Underpinnings of Mercosur: An Empirical Examination”. Latin American Research Review. 2005, vol 40, n° 1, 138–64.
MATTHEIS, Frank; WUNDERLICH, Uwe. “Regional Actorness and Interregional Relations: ASEAN, the EU and Mercosur”. Journal of European Integration. 2017, vol 39, n° 6, 723–38. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2017.1333503>
MEUNIER, Sophie and NICOLAIDIS, Kalypso. “The European Union as a Conflicted Trade Power”. Journal of European Public Policy. 2006, vol 13, n° 6, 906–25.
MEUNIER, Sophie and NICOLAIDIS, Kalypso. “Who Speaks for Europe? The Delegation of Trade Authority in the EU”. Journal of Common Market Studies. 1999, vol 37, n° 3, 477–501. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00174>
MEUNIER, Sophie. “A Faustian Bargain or Just a Good Bargain? Chinese Foreign Direct Investment and Politics in Europe”. Asia Eur Journal. 2014, 143–58. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-014-0382-x>
MEUNIER, Sophie. “Managing Globalization? The EU in International Trade Negotiations”. Journal of Common Market Studies. 2007. vol 45, n° 4, 905–26. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00753.x>
MORAVCSIK, Andrew. “In Defence of the ‘Democratic Deficit’: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union”. Journal of Common Market Studies. 2002, vol 40, n° 4, 603–24. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00390>
MORIN JEAN, Frédéric and CARTA, Caterina. “Overlapping and Evolving European Discourses on Market Liberalization”. British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2014, vol 16, n° 1, 117–32. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12021>
NUTTALL, S. European Foreign Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
PUTNAM, Robert. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games”. International Organization. 1988, vol 42, n° 3.
RÜLAND, Jürgen. “Balancers, Multilateral Utilities or Regional Identity Builders? International Relations and the Study of Interregionalism”. Journal of European Public Policy. 2010, vol 17, n° 8, 1271–83. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2010.513586>
SCHELLING, Thomas. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960.
SHANNON, Sarah; DAMRO, Chad. “Market Power Europe: Exploring a Dynamic Conceptual Framework Market Power Europe: Exploring a Dynamic Conceptual Framework”. Journal of European Public Policy. 2015, 1–19. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1046903>
SÖDERBAUM, Fredrik, STALGREN, Patrik; VAN LANGENHOVE, Luk. “The EU as a Global Actor and the Dynamics of Interregionalism: A Comparative Analysis”. Journal of European Integration. vol 27, n° 3, 365–80. Available in: h
WOOLCOCK, Stephen. “EU Trade and Investment Policymaking After The”. 2010, 22–25. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-010-0321-z>
YOUNG Alasdair R. “European Trade Policy in Interesting Times European Trade Policy in Interesting Times”. Journal of European Integration. 2017, vol 39, n° 7, 909–23. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2017.1371705>.
YOUNG, Alasdair R. Trade Policy in a Changing EU and an Uncertain World, 2017.
YOUNG, Alasdair R.; PETERSON, John. “The EU and the New Trade Politics”. Journal of European Public Policy. vol 13, n° 6, 795–814. Available in: <https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600837104>
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Secretaria do Tribunal Permanente de Revisão