Abstract
The purpose of this essay is to present the new procedure of legislative interconsultation established between the Parlasur and the parliaments of the national states of the Mercosur countries. Among the various forms and methods of relationship and interaction between international law and national law in general; and between international parliaments and national parliaments in particular, the legislative interconsultation procedure established by Parlasur is unique, original and innovative. The legislative interconsultation procedure of Parlasur establishes, first of all, a communication channel from the Parlasur downwards towards the national parliaments. But in addition - what is even more important - it also establishes a communication procedure upwards, from the national parliaments to the Parlasur. This reciprocal communication and interaction, “back and forth,” through a legal and formal procedure between two levels of legal production - the international level and the national level - introduces a new form of relationship between legal systems, since, perhaps, For the first time, the initiative and referral of standards is formally allowed from the national level to be considered at an international level. And still more, from a substantial point of view, this procedure guarantees, as it only happens exceptionally, the democratic legitimacy of the forms of legal production for the regulation of transnational problems.References
ACECEDO, D. “Relación entre el derecho internacional y el derecho interno”. Revista IIDH, 1992, vol 16, p. 133-164.
BERGAMASCHINE MATA DIZ, J. (2005), El Sistema de Internalización de normas en el MERCOSUR: la supranacionalidad plena y la vigencia simultánea. Revista Ius et Praxis, 2005, vol 11, n° 2, p. 227 – 260.
COHEN, J. L. Globalization and Sovereignty: Rethinking Legality, Legitimacy, and Constitutionalism. Cambridge University Press, 2012, p. 21-79.
DREYZIN DE KLOR, Adriana. “La proporcionalidad en la composición del Parlamento del MERCOSUR y los desafíos de las legislaciones electorales nacionales”. Revista Brasilera de Derecho Constitucional, 2012, nº 15.
FINIZIO, G. y Gallo, E. (Eds.). Democracy at the United Nations: The UN in the Age of Globalization. Brussells: Peter Lang, 2013.
GIMÉNEZ-CORTE, Cristián. “La Función Del Derecho Internacional Privado En La Era De La Globalización: Un Manifiesto Jurídico”. Papeles del Centro de Investigaciones, 2016. p. 83-106. Disponible en: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2943103
GIMÉNEZ-CORTE, Cristián. What’s wrong with the United Nations? (And why nobody cares), IPR., New York, 2018, vol 6, n° 1, p. 30–41.
HARRIS, D. J. Cases and Materials on International Law. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1998, p. 68-78.
MALLOCH-BROWN, M. The Unfinished Global Revolution: The Road to International Cooperation, Penguin, 2013.
MORAL, Rasilla del. “Una aproximación al debate democrático en derecho internacional”. En X Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional, 2010, p. 97-148.
PEROTTI, A. Proporcionalidad atenuada en el futuro Parlamento del MERCOSUR. Derecho MERCOSUR. Disponible en: http://www.mercosurabc.com.ar/nota.asp?IdNota=1395&IdSeccion=14
PEROTTI, Alejandro. “Estructura Institucional y Derecho en el MERCOSUR”. Rev. Derecho Internacional y del MERCOSUR, 2012, vol 06, n° 01.
PRATES, C. “La constitución del Parlamento de MERCOSUR. Un enfoque desde la gobernanza política”. Cuadernos de Integración Europea, 2006, p. 47-60
RODRÍGUEZ, J. L. y VICENTE, D. E. Aplicabilidad y validez de las normas de derecho internacional, en Derecho Nacional y Derecho Internacional. Paradojas en su articulación. Buenos Aires: Eudem, 2017, p. 23-61.
TWINING,W. Globalisation & Legal Theory. London: Edinburgh, Dublin, Butterworths, 2000, p. 4-10.
WEISS, Thomas G. What’s Wrong with the United Nations and How to Fix It. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008, p. 191-215
WHEATLEY, Steven. “A democratic rule of international law”. En EJIL, 2011, vol 22, n° 2, p. 525-548.