Keywords
MERCOSUR
Challenges and perspectives
How to Cite
Abstract
What would be the main challenges and current perspectives of the Permanent Review Tribunal fifteen years after the settlement of its offices in the Republic of Paraguay? Normative, doctrinal and practical sources are used in an attempt to comply with the reflections proposed. The paper points the centrality of institutionalized dispute settlement systems as a requirement to identify international organizations to show that MERCOSUR not only fulfills the requirement but also has an improved framework to solve disputes. Diplomacy gains centrality in the debate when the tribunal is analyzed as the possible structure for the desired integration and when identifying the positive factors that led to the choice of Asunción to receive its offices. Finally, the paper concludes its appointments with an overview of the development of the atypical functions of the tribunal that successfully promote its expanded operation nowadays.
References
CASELLA, Paulo Borba. BRIC: Uma perspectiva de cooperação internacional. São Paulo: Atlas, 2011.
MERCOSUL. CMC/DEC 01/05.
MERCOSUL. Protocolo de Brasília. 1991.
MERCOSUL. Protocolo de Olivos. 2002.
MERCOSUL. Protocolo de Ouro Preto. 1994.
MERCOSUL. Tratado de Assunção. 1991.
TAVARES, S. M.; VASCONCELOS, Raphael Carvalho. “La Competencia Consultiva del Tribunal Permanente de Revisión del MERCOSUR: Legitimación y Objeto”. Revista da Secretaria do Tribunal Permanente de Revisão, 2014, vol 2, nº 4, p. 117-133.
TJUE. Costa/Enel. 1964.
TJUE. Van Gend & Loos. 1963.
TPR. Laudo 01/2012.
VASCONCELOS, Raphael Carvalho de. Teoria do estado e a unidade do direito internacional - domesticando o rinoceronte. Belo Horizonte: Arraes, 2016.
VASCONCELOS, Raphael Carvalho. “Organizaciones internacionales y tratados asociativos: por una nueva clasificación de los sujetos de derecho internacional”. Revista da Secretaria do Tribunal Permanente de Revisão, 2015, vol 3, nº 6, p.178-206.
