Abstract
The Statute of Citizenship of MERCOSUR was conceived as a response to the need of considering the individual as part of the process of regional integration, compromised by its intergovernmental character, based on the mutual agreement of its members, not always, is oriented toward integration. This article postulates a change of paradigms: from the political management of the Executive, to the protection of rights of the Judiciary. National courts are used to respect foreigners, to apply alien law, and, to consider foreign precedents. They can, therefore, strengthen the structure which sustains Mercosur’s citizenship: the freedom to establish residence, the free exercise of labor, and, the correction of the democracy deficit. The sole obstacle is the deference to the opinions and interpretations performed by the Executive. This article suggests that in this case there are still important judicial opinions, as those in the European Union, which must be followed, in addition, it is necessary the autonomy of national courts to build regional integration and, consequently, MERCOSUR’s citizenship.
References
ARENDT, Hannah. Men in Dark Times. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1970.
BARAK, Aharon. The Judge in a Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.
BARROSO, Luís Roberto. Curso de Direito Constitucional Contemporâneo: os conceitos Fundamentais e a Construção do Novo Modelo. São Paulo-SP: Saraiva, 2018.
CANOTILHO, Joaquim G. Direito Constitucional. Coimbra: Almedina, 2003.
CASSESE, Antonio. International Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
FISH, Stanley. Interpreting the Variorum. Critical Inquiry, 2 (1), 1976, pp. 483.
HAILBRONNER, K.; GOGOLIN, J. Aliens. In: Max Plank Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Disponible en: <http://opil.ouplaw.com>. Acceso en: 20 enero 2020.
MEIRELLES, Hely Lopes. Mandado de Segurança, Ação Popular, Ação Civil Pública, Mandado de Injunção, Habeas Data. São Paulo: Malheiros, 1990.
POSNER, Eric. The Twilight of Human Rights Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
ROSENFELD, Michel. Towards a Reconstruction of Constitutional Equality. In: M. Rosenfeld, N. Dorsen, A. Sajó & S. Baer (Eds.), Comparative Constitutionalism, Cases and Materials (pp.670 – 674). St. Paul, MN: West, 2003.
SACHAR, Ayelet. Citizenship. In: M. Rosenfeld & A. Sajó (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (pp. 1002 – 1019). New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
SCALIA, Antonin. Judicial Deference to Administrative Interpretations of Law. Duke Law Journal, 1989, vol 3, 511 – 521.
SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de la Secretaría del Tribunal Permanente de Revisión